Clinician Attitudes toward Borderline Personality Disorder Essay

Clinician Attitudes toward Borderline Personality Disorder - Essay sampleThis study aims to prove that often, even the amiable health clinicians dealing with BPD squander less than sympathetic views on the disorder. The study is correlational, because there are no experi kind techniques used. Correlational studies look to show the relationship surrounded by variables and results. This study looks to see correlation between sub-types of clinician, years worked in mental health care and sum of patients with BPD cared for in the past year and the attitudes toward patients with BPD. It is also a cross-sectional study, in that it provides learning on attitudes at a certain point in time. The questionnaire was distributed to all relevant clinicians at all nine decocts simultaneously, and frankincense all responses were formed at a similar point in time. The study provides no information on how the variables may affect the participants over time (and is thus not a longitudinal study ). The subjects were 706 mental health clinicians (clinicians in this case being an umbrella term for nurses, physicians, social workers, psychologists etc.) from 9 different pedantic centers. Every clinician within these centers was provided with a questionnaire, and the 706 respondents were those that replied they were a self-selecting sample. The issue with this is that there may be a subtype of soul who is more likely to respond to this type of survey they may have more time uncommitted than otherwises and thus may be more understanding of patients with BPD.... However, the aforementioned subtype of clinician likely to respond and the very spirit of questionnaires mean that any responses lack true ecological validity. The primary variables, as defined by the study, were the particular(prenominal) subgroup of clinician (psychiatrist, psychiatry resident, social worker, staff nurse, nurse practitioner/physician assistant, psychologist, and other), the number of years havin g worked with mental health patients, and the number of patients with BPD that the individual has worked with over the past year. The secondary variables or covariates were the gender of the individual and the center at which they worked. In my opinion, the primary variables were reasonable for this study. The specific subgroup opinion was part of the hypothesis (the coordinators of the study do predictions such as social workers will have more caring attitudes) and thus was a paint variable. The number of patients with BPD that the individual has worked with is also key. The number-based variables were assessed in groups, such as 0-5, 6-10 etc., and again this is a reasonable measurement, although there are some issues where a clinician has worked in the area for 5 years the individual may have attitudes more similar to the 6-10 group. The subgroup variable was also useful as it had a diverse range of roles available, although the other group may be too ambiguous and provide res ults that need further probing. The main line of work with the study is the fact that the subtype of clinician was highly variable in the number of respondents 227 psychiatrists responded, compared to only 17 nurse practitioners. This meaning that any conclusion formed from the responses