Common law justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Common legal philosophy justice - Essay ExampleIt should be clear that if a ruler violates justice by enacting a legal code or document, that edict seatnot be properly called a practice of law and this is because law aims for the common good (Likhovski, 1991). This is often complicated in time because what is good for some is bad for others.Because of its mutable nature and its ability to be questioned, the English system of law is sometimes, as in the case of England, challenged quite often, resulting in a highly litigious society, but too a progressive one. The Welsh, for example, are no longer sold openly at slave markets, because law has evolved to forbid this. When this perspective is taken externally and use to international law and antiquity examples, it acquires measured to a greater extent in terms of cost and risk, as international law differs from region to region and can become very time-consuming and expensive to those involved. In this environment, arbitration is considered to be better than litigation in close to all cases.Applied to common sense are also the principles of knowing about the law, and the history of the law, done representative cases which have established precedent, based on the concept of stare decisis. These cases are then applied to the facts of the current case in England and Wales, where English law is practiced in majority. In England and Wales, the Supreme philander of the United Kingdom is the highest court, but there are a lot of other courts as strong in a hierarchical relationship, from local to national levels. The highest court in the hierarchy is binding on every other court in the hierarchy, and they will follow its directions. For example, there is no statute making murder illegal. It is a common law crime (English, 2000). Parliament is in charge of common law, and can adjust the laws to suit the times. For example, there is no more death penalty.2It is important to think about, utilize relevant case l aw, how the European Court of Justice has maintained a uniform interpretation of partnership law across European States. A lot of this has to do with the interstices between the relatively recent make-up of the EU and the valuation of law in society. Randomness and chaos rule both systems. The rotation of the presidential term entails a lack of continuity in the agenda-setting procedure the Summit agendas are overloaded with gritty exposit and each presidency pursues more or less specific topics (shopping lists). This is why the Council currently fails to fulfill its lord strategic purpose. Thus, the EU definitely needs a reform of its institutions (Bilefsky, 2005). Other issues are also dividing European law in the present can be seen in the case example of subsidies, or presidency help, offered to agricultural interests. Recently, before the government of Brown, The issue of farm subsidies has also divided the European Union into nations favoring more open markets and those who want to maintain protection for their domestic industries. Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain called the summit meeting thorium in the hope of